- What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
- Nothing was really surprising for me in the reading as I am already interested in the legality of intellectual property (and other legal topics), but it was interesting to see it applied directly to entrepreneurship as opposed to criminal justice topics.
- Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
- I felt like this entire section was pretty straightforward. There was not anything I found confusing.
- If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
- If you could create a patent for anything (already patented or not patented), what would it be?
- I would ask this because a lot of good ideas have already been patented and I would want to know what his "missed opportunity" would be.
- What are your thoughts on the patenting of particular lines of code in programming projects?
- This question is pretty specific, but there are a lot of arguments about the validity of patenting code as there are only so many ways one can make a section of code perform one task.
- Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
- Since a lot of the information in this section was factual and not based on the author's opinion, there is nothing that I thought the author was wrong about and nothing I disagreed with in particular.
Sunday, February 7, 2016
Week 5 Reading Reflection
Howdy! Here is week 5's reading reflection on chapter 9:
Labels:
Week 5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment